The trial case 51/PUU-IX/2011 number of test-related laws, the National Social Security System Act (Jamsosnas) postponed and will be held again on Thursday (4 / 11). It declared by the Chief Judge of the Constitutional Plenary Ahmad Fadlil Sumadi in court listening to the statements of witnesses / experts from the applicant and the Government. This was decided after the deliberation of the Constitutional Court advance. "The judges agreed postponed," said Fadlil.

Reason for the delay due to the applicant, until the trial began at 11.00 am, can not produce witnesses or experts in the trial. "Up to eleven o’clock in the morning our experts are still on the road," said one of the Petitioner’s attorneys, M. Maulana Bungaran.

Before closing the hearing, Fadlil also reminded the Petitioner that this should not happen again. "Given the opportunity once again to produce witnesses or experts in the trial," he said.

In previous trials, Wednesday (7 / 9), the Petitioner explained that it was a test of 18 articles in the National Social Security Act, namely Article 17, Article 19, Article 20, Article 21, Article, 27, Article 28, Article 29, Article 30, Article 34, Article 35, Article 36, Article 38, Article 39, Article 40, Article 42, Article 43, Article 44 and Article 46 of Law Social Security System. According to Petitioners, the social security system settings in the Social Security System Law are regulated by the national insurance system as mentioned in these articles. Petitioner asserts, there are two major differences between the national social security systems with the national insurance system.

"In the petition, we explained that the national social security is part of the constitution and human rights, because in the constitution, the social security system provided for in the chapter on human rights. While insurance is a relationship that cause between civil rights and obligations between the insurer and the insured that provides benefits and premiums. Insurance is not the property rights in the constitution or human rights, but rights for premiums or civil relationships. Therefore, the National Social Security Act governing the social security system into the national insurance, in our opinion has eliminated the right of the applicant to obtain a national social security rights, "explained one of the Petitioner’s attorneys, Habiburokhman. (Dodi / mh/Yazid.tr)